Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 95954 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Integrated Drive Generator and Starter Generator were examined for tariff classification, and the Tribunal held that CTH 8501 applied because CTH 8511 is confined to generators used with spark-ignition or compression-ignition internal combustion engines. As the goods were used with gas turbine aircraft engines, the department's reclassification failed and the customs duty, interest and consequential demand were set aside. The Customs Broker penalty also failed because the broker does not determine classification, and no overt act, involvement or connivance was proved; the section 117 penalty was therefore unwarranted.
Integrated Drive Generator and Starter Generator were examined for tariff classification, and the Tribunal held that CTH 8501 applied because CTH 8511 is confined to generators used with spark-ignition or compression-ignition internal combustion engines. As the goods were used with gas turbine aircraft engines, the department's reclassification failed and the customs duty, interest and consequential demand were set aside. The Customs Broker penalty also failed because the broker does not determine classification, and no overt act, involvement or connivance was proved; the section 117 penalty was therefore unwarranted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.