Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Integrated Drive Generator and Starter Generator were examined for tariff classification, and the Tribunal held that CTH 8501 applied because CTH 8511 is confined to generators used with spark-ignition or compression-ignition internal combustion engines. As the goods were used with gas turbine aircraft engines, the department's reclassification failed and the customs duty, interest and consequential demand were set aside. The Customs Broker penalty also failed because the broker does not determine classification, and no overt act, involvement or connivance was proved; the section 117 penalty was therefore unwarranted.
Integrated Drive Generator and Starter Generator were examined for tariff classification, and the Tribunal held that CTH 8501 applied because CTH 8511 is confined to generators used with spark-ignition or compression-ignition internal combustion engines. As the goods were used with gas turbine aircraft engines, the department's reclassification failed and the customs duty, interest and consequential demand were set aside. The Customs Broker penalty also failed because the broker does not determine classification, and no overt act, involvement or connivance was proved; the section 117 penalty was therefore unwarranted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.