Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
No penalty was sustained against a Customs Broker for alleged movement of imported goods before out-of-charge because the vehicles carrying the goods remained within the Land Customs Station and were available for drawal of samples by DRI. On that factual basis, the alleged breach of permitting movement without out-of-charge was not made out. The Tribunal also noted that the appellant had already been discharged in the CBLR proceedings, making the impugned penalty unwarranted. The penalties were set aside and the appeals were allowed.
No penalty was sustained against a Customs Broker for alleged movement of imported goods before out-of-charge because the vehicles carrying the goods remained within the Land Customs Station and were available for drawal of samples by DRI. On that factual basis, the alleged breach of permitting movement without out-of-charge was not made out. The Tribunal also noted that the appellant had already been discharged in the CBLR proceedings, making the impugned penalty unwarranted. The penalties were set aside and the appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.