Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
No penalty was sustained against a Customs Broker for alleged movement of imported goods before out-of-charge because the vehicles carrying the goods remained within the Land Customs Station and were available for drawal of samples by DRI. On that factual basis, the alleged breach of permitting movement without out-of-charge was not made out. The Tribunal also noted that the appellant had already been discharged in the CBLR proceedings, making the impugned penalty unwarranted. The penalties were set aside and the appeals were allowed.
No penalty was sustained against a Customs Broker for alleged movement of imported goods before out-of-charge because the vehicles carrying the goods remained within the Land Customs Station and were available for drawal of samples by DRI. On that factual basis, the alleged breach of permitting movement without out-of-charge was not made out. The Tribunal also noted that the appellant had already been discharged in the CBLR proceedings, making the impugned penalty unwarranted. The penalties were set aside and the appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.