Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
A repeated Section 94 application by a personal guarantor was held not maintainable after an earlier fresh petition had already been dismissed on merits as time-barred. The tribunal treated the later filing as an identical attempt, noting suppression of the intervening dismissal and a pattern of repeated petitions aimed at securing interim moratorium and delaying recovery. It also rejected the argument that limitation began only from the possession notice, because a separate demand notice had already been issued to the guarantor earlier; the limitation finding based on that earlier notice was upheld. On these facts, the subsequent petition was held barred by res judicata, the abuse of process was found serious, and costs were imposed.
A repeated Section 94 application by a personal guarantor was held not maintainable after an earlier fresh petition had already been dismissed on merits as time-barred. The tribunal treated the later filing as an identical attempt, noting suppression of the intervening dismissal and a pattern of repeated petitions aimed at securing interim moratorium and delaying recovery. It also rejected the argument that limitation began only from the possession notice, because a separate demand notice had already been issued to the guarantor earlier; the limitation finding based on that earlier notice was upheld. On these facts, the subsequent petition was held barred by res judicata, the abuse of process was found serious, and costs were imposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
