Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Input tax credit on reverse charge services from an unregistered foreign supplier was treated as sustainable where the registered recipient raised a self-invoice, discharged tax under reverse charge, and claimed credit on that basis. Reading section 9(3), section 16(2)(a), section 31(3)(f) and rule 36 together, the self-invoice was recognised as a valid tax-paying document, and credit could not be denied merely because the foreign supplier's invoice identified a particular unit. The text also states that, for the relevant period, ITC distribution to other distinct persons without Input Service Distributor registration was not impermissible, as unamended section 20 was only enabling and the later compulsory-registration amendment indicated the earlier position. Revenue neutrality was noted as supporting denial of no technical objection.
Input tax credit on reverse charge services from an unregistered foreign supplier was treated as sustainable where the registered recipient raised a self-invoice, discharged tax under reverse charge, and claimed credit on that basis. Reading section 9(3), section 16(2)(a), section 31(3)(f) and rule 36 together, the self-invoice was recognised as a valid tax-paying document, and credit could not be denied merely because the foreign supplier's invoice identified a particular unit. The text also states that, for the relevant period, ITC distribution to other distinct persons without Input Service Distributor registration was not impermissible, as unamended section 20 was only enabling and the later compulsory-registration amendment indicated the earlier position. Revenue neutrality was noted as supporting denial of no technical objection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.