Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Delayed or non-deposit of deducted GST/TDS relating to Gram Sabha works was held to fall within the U.P. GST Act, 2017 as a complete special code covering default, penalty, prosecution and compounding, so general penal law could not be invoked unless distinct offences such as cheating, forgery or misappropriation were independently made out. The Court further held that a substantive penal provision cannot be applied to an alleged omission of the 2017-18 financial year when the invoked B.N.S. provision was not then in force. On these grounds, the charge-sheet, cognizance order and consequential proceedings were quashed.
Delayed or non-deposit of deducted GST/TDS relating to Gram Sabha works was held to fall within the U.P. GST Act, 2017 as a complete special code covering default, penalty, prosecution and compounding, so general penal law could not be invoked unless distinct offences such as cheating, forgery or misappropriation were independently made out. The Court further held that a substantive penal provision cannot be applied to an alleged omission of the 2017-18 financial year when the invoked B.N.S. provision was not then in force. On these grounds, the charge-sheet, cognizance order and consequential proceedings were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
