Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration was held permissible because section 29(2) expressly allows cancellation from any date, including a past date, and the second proviso authorises suspension of registration during pending cancellation proceedings. The HC rejected the contention that suspension cannot operate retrospectively. It also declined to entertain the challenge to the cancellation provisions and the show cause notice, noting that fraud was alleged, time and personal hearing were granted, and the petitioner had filed no reply despite opportunity. The writ was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to raise all available pleas in response to the notice.
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration was held permissible because section 29(2) expressly allows cancellation from any date, including a past date, and the second proviso authorises suspension of registration during pending cancellation proceedings. The HC rejected the contention that suspension cannot operate retrospectively. It also declined to entertain the challenge to the cancellation provisions and the show cause notice, noting that fraud was alleged, time and personal hearing were granted, and the petitioner had filed no reply despite opportunity. The writ was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to raise all available pleas in response to the notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
