Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration was held permissible because section 29(2) expressly allows cancellation from any date, including a past date, and the second proviso authorises suspension of registration during pending cancellation proceedings. The HC rejected the contention that suspension cannot operate retrospectively. It also declined to entertain the challenge to the cancellation provisions and the show cause notice, noting that fraud was alleged, time and personal hearing were granted, and the petitioner had filed no reply despite opportunity. The writ was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to raise all available pleas in response to the notice.
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration was held permissible because section 29(2) expressly allows cancellation from any date, including a past date, and the second proviso authorises suspension of registration during pending cancellation proceedings. The HC rejected the contention that suspension cannot operate retrospectively. It also declined to entertain the challenge to the cancellation provisions and the show cause notice, noting that fraud was alleged, time and personal hearing were granted, and the petitioner had filed no reply despite opportunity. The writ was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to raise all available pleas in response to the notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
