Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
IGST refund on exports could not be rejected merely because the exporter had claimed the higher duty drawback rate under Circular No. 37/2018, since that circular had already been held invalid as inconsistent with the statutory provisions and refund rules. Relying on the earlier High Court rulings, the Court set aside the rejection founded solely on that circular and remitted the refund claim for fresh consideration in accordance with law after giving the exporter an opportunity of hearing.
IGST refund on exports could not be rejected merely because the exporter had claimed the higher duty drawback rate under Circular No. 37/2018, since that circular had already been held invalid as inconsistent with the statutory provisions and refund rules. Relying on the earlier High Court rulings, the Court set aside the rejection founded solely on that circular and remitted the refund claim for fresh consideration in accordance with law after giving the exporter an opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.