Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
An assessment made as a consequential order under the revision mechanism does not survive once the underlying revision orders are set aside and remitted for fresh consideration. Here, the Tribunal held that the assessment passed under sections 147, 263 and 144B depended entirely on section 263 orders that had already been sent back to the Principal Commissioner for a fresh order. Because that foundation had ceased to exist, the assessment order and the appellate order affirming it were treated as infructuous, and the appeals were dismissed on that basis.
An assessment made as a consequential order under the revision mechanism does not survive once the underlying revision orders are set aside and remitted for fresh consideration. Here, the Tribunal held that the assessment passed under sections 147, 263 and 144B depended entirely on section 263 orders that had already been sent back to the Principal Commissioner for a fresh order. Because that foundation had ceased to exist, the assessment order and the appellate order affirming it were treated as infructuous, and the appeals were dismissed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
