Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
An assessment made as a consequential order under the revision mechanism does not survive once the underlying revision orders are set aside and remitted for fresh consideration. Here, the Tribunal held that the assessment passed under sections 147, 263 and 144B depended entirely on section 263 orders that had already been sent back to the Principal Commissioner for a fresh order. Because that foundation had ceased to exist, the assessment order and the appellate order affirming it were treated as infructuous, and the appeals were dismissed on that basis.
An assessment made as a consequential order under the revision mechanism does not survive once the underlying revision orders are set aside and remitted for fresh consideration. Here, the Tribunal held that the assessment passed under sections 147, 263 and 144B depended entirely on section 263 orders that had already been sent back to the Principal Commissioner for a fresh order. Because that foundation had ceased to exist, the assessment order and the appellate order affirming it were treated as infructuous, and the appeals were dismissed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.