Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In transfer pricing benchmarking, the turnover filter and broad functional comparability were treated as relevant comparability criteria under TNMM. A diagnostics company was validly excluded because its turnover fell below the modified range, and earlier-year inclusion did not control since each year must be tested on its own facts. A separate glassware and laboratory-products company was also excluded because its product mix and customer profile were not broadly comparable to medical devices used in patient treatment. Subvention receipts under the distribution arrangement were held to reduce operating cost, not form part of operating revenue, so the assessee's operating margin was correctly taken at 5.04%.
In transfer pricing benchmarking, the turnover filter and broad functional comparability were treated as relevant comparability criteria under TNMM. A diagnostics company was validly excluded because its turnover fell below the modified range, and earlier-year inclusion did not control since each year must be tested on its own facts. A separate glassware and laboratory-products company was also excluded because its product mix and customer profile were not broadly comparable to medical devices used in patient treatment. Subvention receipts under the distribution arrangement were held to reduce operating cost, not form part of operating revenue, so the assessee's operating margin was correctly taken at 5.04%.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.