Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest differential credited to statutory development funds was treated as diverted at source under the scheme directions, so it was not taxable in the assessee's hands; the Tribunal followed its earlier orders in the assessee's own case and noted that the assessee acted only as a nodal or implementing agency. Promotional and developmental expenditure was also allowed because the assessee had been notified from financial year 2012-13, applicable from assessment year 2013-14, so the basis of disallowance failed. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed and the appellate order was upheld in full.
Interest differential credited to statutory development funds was treated as diverted at source under the scheme directions, so it was not taxable in the assessee's hands; the Tribunal followed its earlier orders in the assessee's own case and noted that the assessee acted only as a nodal or implementing agency. Promotional and developmental expenditure was also allowed because the assessee had been notified from financial year 2012-13, applicable from assessment year 2013-14, so the basis of disallowance failed. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed and the appellate order was upheld in full.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
