Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
For charitable income, Explanation 2(ii)(b) to section 11(1) operated as a mechanism distinct from accumulation under section 11(2): the assessee claimed only deemed application in the immediately succeeding year, not long-term accumulation. The Tribunal held that, for A.Y. 2015-16, a written option within the time allowed under section 139(1) was sufficient; the later Form No. 9A requirement could not be applied retrospectively. Disclosure in the return and furnishing of reasons before completion of assessment satisfied the statutory condition, so the disallowance of deemed application and the consequential denial of exemption were unsustainable.
For charitable income, Explanation 2(ii)(b) to section 11(1) operated as a mechanism distinct from accumulation under section 11(2): the assessee claimed only deemed application in the immediately succeeding year, not long-term accumulation. The Tribunal held that, for A.Y. 2015-16, a written option within the time allowed under section 139(1) was sufficient; the later Form No. 9A requirement could not be applied retrospectively. Disclosure in the return and furnishing of reasons before completion of assessment satisfied the statutory condition, so the disallowance of deemed application and the consequential denial of exemption were unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.