Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For charitable income, Explanation 2(ii)(b) to section 11(1) operated as a mechanism distinct from accumulation under section 11(2): the assessee claimed only deemed application in the immediately succeeding year, not long-term accumulation. The Tribunal held that, for A.Y. 2015-16, a written option within the time allowed under section 139(1) was sufficient; the later Form No. 9A requirement could not be applied retrospectively. Disclosure in the return and furnishing of reasons before completion of assessment satisfied the statutory condition, so the disallowance of deemed application and the consequential denial of exemption were unsustainable.
For charitable income, Explanation 2(ii)(b) to section 11(1) operated as a mechanism distinct from accumulation under section 11(2): the assessee claimed only deemed application in the immediately succeeding year, not long-term accumulation. The Tribunal held that, for A.Y. 2015-16, a written option within the time allowed under section 139(1) was sufficient; the later Form No. 9A requirement could not be applied retrospectively. Disclosure in the return and furnishing of reasons before completion of assessment satisfied the statutory condition, so the disallowance of deemed application and the consequential denial of exemption were unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.