Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95999 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee's explanation for the alleged shortfall in wastage was supported by job-work records, invoices and confirmations, and the Tribunal found no factual infirmity; the rejection of books and estimated gross profit addition were therefore deleted. In reassessment, additions for contract-payment TDS default and delayed provident fund contribution could not survive once the recorded reason for reopening itself failed in appeal, because jurisdiction to sustain unrelated additions depends on survival of the original reopening ground. A donation deduction disallowance was not decided on merits, as adverse material was not furnished and cross-examination was denied; the matter was restored for fresh adjudication after due hearing.
Assessee's explanation for the alleged shortfall in wastage was supported by job-work records, invoices and confirmations, and the Tribunal found no factual infirmity; the rejection of books and estimated gross profit addition were therefore deleted. In reassessment, additions for contract-payment TDS default and delayed provident fund contribution could not survive once the recorded reason for reopening itself failed in appeal, because jurisdiction to sustain unrelated additions depends on survival of the original reopening ground. A donation deduction disallowance was not decided on merits, as adverse material was not furnished and cross-examination was denied; the matter was restored for fresh adjudication after due hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.