Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 3(b) contravention was sustained because the provision prohibits payment to, or for the credit of, a person resident outside India and does not require routing through a non-authorised person; however, the proprietrix's penalty on this count was reduced on the facts. Regulation 6(1) was held inapplicable to an individual resident proprietrix, so the penalty imposed under Section 10(6) read with Regulation 6(1) was deleted. Delayed settlement of import dues was treated as a contravention warranting penalty, but the quantum was substantially reduced for want of adequate pursuit in all respects. Separate penalties on the power of attorney holder were deleted because the attorney acted only as an agent and could not be treated as part of a body of individuals.
Section 3(b) contravention was sustained because the provision prohibits payment to, or for the credit of, a person resident outside India and does not require routing through a non-authorised person; however, the proprietrix's penalty on this count was reduced on the facts. Regulation 6(1) was held inapplicable to an individual resident proprietrix, so the penalty imposed under Section 10(6) read with Regulation 6(1) was deleted. Delayed settlement of import dues was treated as a contravention warranting penalty, but the quantum was substantially reduced for want of adequate pursuit in all respects. Separate penalties on the power of attorney holder were deleted because the attorney acted only as an agent and could not be treated as part of a body of individuals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.