Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interference with a show cause notice is unwarranted unless it is ex facie without jurisdiction. Here, the GST dispute over an offshore construction contract turned on factual questions, including local procurement, shipments from the India office, and consolidation of Mauritius site accounts in the Indian company's financials. Those features had a bearing on the territorial applicability of GST, so the notice was not patently without jurisdiction and could not be quashed in writ proceedings as premature. The cited advance-ruling decision was distinguished because it did not arise from a writ challenge to a notice on disputed facts.
Interference with a show cause notice is unwarranted unless it is ex facie without jurisdiction. Here, the GST dispute over an offshore construction contract turned on factual questions, including local procurement, shipments from the India office, and consolidation of Mauritius site accounts in the Indian company's financials. Those features had a bearing on the territorial applicability of GST, so the notice was not patently without jurisdiction and could not be quashed in writ proceedings as premature. The cited advance-ruling decision was distinguished because it did not arise from a writ challenge to a notice on disputed facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
