Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Territorial jurisdiction in writ proceedings depends on where the cause of action arises, and a GST assessment challenge must be filed before the forum connected with the impugned order. Here, the assessment order was passed by the proper officer at Chandigarh, and the dispute stemmed from the return filed there, so no part of the cause of action arose within Patna HC's jurisdiction. The petitioner's lease of parking space at Patna was held insufficient to confer jurisdiction. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable, with liberty to approach the competent forum.
Territorial jurisdiction in writ proceedings depends on where the cause of action arises, and a GST assessment challenge must be filed before the forum connected with the impugned order. Here, the assessment order was passed by the proper officer at Chandigarh, and the dispute stemmed from the return filed there, so no part of the cause of action arose within Patna HC's jurisdiction. The petitioner's lease of parking space at Patna was held insufficient to confer jurisdiction. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable, with liberty to approach the competent forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.