Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Territorial jurisdiction in writ proceedings depends on where the cause of action arises, and a GST assessment challenge must be filed before the forum connected with the impugned order. Here, the assessment order was passed by the proper officer at Chandigarh, and the dispute stemmed from the return filed there, so no part of the cause of action arose within Patna HC's jurisdiction. The petitioner's lease of parking space at Patna was held insufficient to confer jurisdiction. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable, with liberty to approach the competent forum.
Territorial jurisdiction in writ proceedings depends on where the cause of action arises, and a GST assessment challenge must be filed before the forum connected with the impugned order. Here, the assessment order was passed by the proper officer at Chandigarh, and the dispute stemmed from the return filed there, so no part of the cause of action arose within Patna HC's jurisdiction. The petitioner's lease of parking space at Patna was held insufficient to confer jurisdiction. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable, with liberty to approach the competent forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.