Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Section 10(26) exemption for a Scheduled Tribe assessee is not automatic; it applies only when the statutory conditions coexist, including that the salary income accrues or arises from a source situated in the notified area. Salary generally accrues where the services are performed, so the employer's office location is not decisive. On the record produced, the employer's certificate only showed current work-from-home status and did not establish that the assessee worked from Meghalaya for the full relevant year, while the employment terms were not produced. The Tribunal therefore remanded the exemption claim to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
Section 10(26) exemption for a Scheduled Tribe assessee is not automatic; it applies only when the statutory conditions coexist, including that the salary income accrues or arises from a source situated in the notified area. Salary generally accrues where the services are performed, so the employer's office location is not decisive. On the record produced, the employer's certificate only showed current work-from-home status and did not establish that the assessee worked from Meghalaya for the full relevant year, while the employment terms were not produced. The Tribunal therefore remanded the exemption claim to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.