Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 10(26) exemption for a Scheduled Tribe assessee is not automatic; it applies only when the statutory conditions coexist, including that the salary income accrues or arises from a source situated in the notified area. Salary generally accrues where the services are performed, so the employer's office location is not decisive. On the record produced, the employer's certificate only showed current work-from-home status and did not establish that the assessee worked from Meghalaya for the full relevant year, while the employment terms were not produced. The Tribunal therefore remanded the exemption claim to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
Section 10(26) exemption for a Scheduled Tribe assessee is not automatic; it applies only when the statutory conditions coexist, including that the salary income accrues or arises from a source situated in the notified area. Salary generally accrues where the services are performed, so the employer's office location is not decisive. On the record produced, the employer's certificate only showed current work-from-home status and did not establish that the assessee worked from Meghalaya for the full relevant year, while the employment terms were not produced. The Tribunal therefore remanded the exemption claim to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.