Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dividend Distribution Tax on dividends paid to Swiss tax resident shareholders was held to be restricted to the more beneficial rate under Article 10 of the India-Switzerland DTAA, following the jurisdictional High Court decision in Colorcon Asia and the rejection of the earlier Special Bench view in Total Oil India. The Tribunal accepted that the treaty rate governed the levy and rejected the Department's beneficial ownership objection because no doubt had been recorded by the assessing or appellate authorities. DDT was therefore to be recomputed at 10%, with refund of excess tax paid.
Dividend Distribution Tax on dividends paid to Swiss tax resident shareholders was held to be restricted to the more beneficial rate under Article 10 of the India-Switzerland DTAA, following the jurisdictional High Court decision in Colorcon Asia and the rejection of the earlier Special Bench view in Total Oil India. The Tribunal accepted that the treaty rate governed the levy and rejected the Department's beneficial ownership objection because no doubt had been recorded by the assessing or appellate authorities. DDT was therefore to be recomputed at 10%, with refund of excess tax paid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.