Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Prior period expenses are deductible only if the liability crystallised in the relevant year and is supported by evidence; the Tribunal remitted the disallowance for fresh verification. ESOP discount was treated as employee remuneration incurred wholly and exclusively for business, so the deduction was allowed and the disallowance deleted. The demerger loss and depreciation claim failed because the statutory conditions for the resulting company were construed strictly and the required share issuance was not satisfied, so carry forward and set-off were denied. Deferred income recognised under the assessee's consistent accounting method was upheld, as earlier orders in its own case remained binding.
Prior period expenses are deductible only if the liability crystallised in the relevant year and is supported by evidence; the Tribunal remitted the disallowance for fresh verification. ESOP discount was treated as employee remuneration incurred wholly and exclusively for business, so the deduction was allowed and the disallowance deleted. The demerger loss and depreciation claim failed because the statutory conditions for the resulting company were construed strictly and the required share issuance was not satisfied, so carry forward and set-off were denied. Deferred income recognised under the assessee's consistent accounting method was upheld, as earlier orders in its own case remained binding.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.