Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
881 to 900 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Prior period expenses are deductible only if the liability crystallised in the relevant year and is supported by evidence; the Tribunal remitted the disallowance for fresh verification. ESOP discount was treated as employee remuneration incurred wholly and exclusively for business, so the deduction was allowed and the disallowance deleted. The demerger loss and depreciation claim failed because the statutory conditions for the resulting company were construed strictly and the required share issuance was not satisfied, so carry forward and set-off were denied. Deferred income recognised under the assessee's consistent accounting method was upheld, as earlier orders in its own case remained binding.
Prior period expenses are deductible only if the liability crystallised in the relevant year and is supported by evidence; the Tribunal remitted the disallowance for fresh verification. ESOP discount was treated as employee remuneration incurred wholly and exclusively for business, so the deduction was allowed and the disallowance deleted. The demerger loss and depreciation claim failed because the statutory conditions for the resulting company were construed strictly and the required share issuance was not satisfied, so carry forward and set-off were denied. Deferred income recognised under the assessee's consistent accounting method was upheld, as earlier orders in its own case remained binding.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.