Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
A registered joint development agreement was treated as not effecting an immediate transfer for capital gains where no consideration was paid on execution and the assessee's right was only to a future 50% share in the constructed area. The arrangement was viewed as enabling the developer to obtain approvals, licences and finance, not as a transfer under part performance. On that basis, long-term capital gains were not taxable in the year of execution; the assessment was quashed, subject to verification of the year in which the share was actually offered to tax.
A registered joint development agreement was treated as not effecting an immediate transfer for capital gains where no consideration was paid on execution and the assessee's right was only to a future 50% share in the constructed area. The arrangement was viewed as enabling the developer to obtain approvals, licences and finance, not as a transfer under part performance. On that basis, long-term capital gains were not taxable in the year of execution; the assessment was quashed, subject to verification of the year in which the share was actually offered to tax.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
