Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A registered joint development agreement was treated as not effecting an immediate transfer for capital gains where no consideration was paid on execution and the assessee's right was only to a future 50% share in the constructed area. The arrangement was viewed as enabling the developer to obtain approvals, licences and finance, not as a transfer under part performance. On that basis, long-term capital gains were not taxable in the year of execution; the assessment was quashed, subject to verification of the year in which the share was actually offered to tax.
A registered joint development agreement was treated as not effecting an immediate transfer for capital gains where no consideration was paid on execution and the assessee's right was only to a future 50% share in the constructed area. The arrangement was viewed as enabling the developer to obtain approvals, licences and finance, not as a transfer under part performance. On that basis, long-term capital gains were not taxable in the year of execution; the assessment was quashed, subject to verification of the year in which the share was actually offered to tax.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
