Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalties for facilitating alleged fraudulent exports were held unsustainable where the Revenue failed to produce cogent, independent or corroborative evidence of the customs broker's conscious involvement in overvaluation or wrongful IGST refund claims. The Tribunal held that mere suspicion, conjecture, presumptions, or the fact that documents passed through intermediaries could not justify penal action. It followed its earlier decision on substantially similar facts and found no material distinction or contrary precedent, so the penalties under Sections 114(iii) and 114AA were set aside.
Penalties for facilitating alleged fraudulent exports were held unsustainable where the Revenue failed to produce cogent, independent or corroborative evidence of the customs broker's conscious involvement in overvaluation or wrongful IGST refund claims. The Tribunal held that mere suspicion, conjecture, presumptions, or the fact that documents passed through intermediaries could not justify penal action. It followed its earlier decision on substantially similar facts and found no material distinction or contrary precedent, so the penalties under Sections 114(iii) and 114AA were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
