Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Bona fide plot purchasers whose bookings and registered sale deeds pre-dated liquidation were entitled to release of their plots, because the transactions were verified as genuine, there was no material showing dominant intention to prefer creditors, and the RBI prohibition order did not invalidate completed third-party conveyances. The Court treated them as similarly placed with purchasers who had already obtained final relief, rejected objections based on alleged lack of authorisation, demarcation, bank records and later layout cancellation, and directed handover of the plots. The review petition by the ex-management side was dismissed, as the applicant had no independent locus standi and the attempt was a proxy effort to reopen final winding-up orders concerning verified investor claims.
Bona fide plot purchasers whose bookings and registered sale deeds pre-dated liquidation were entitled to release of their plots, because the transactions were verified as genuine, there was no material showing dominant intention to prefer creditors, and the RBI prohibition order did not invalidate completed third-party conveyances. The Court treated them as similarly placed with purchasers who had already obtained final relief, rejected objections based on alleged lack of authorisation, demarcation, bank records and later layout cancellation, and directed handover of the plots. The review petition by the ex-management side was dismissed, as the applicant had no independent locus standi and the attempt was a proxy effort to reopen final winding-up orders concerning verified investor claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
