Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Bona fide plot purchasers whose bookings and registered sale deeds pre-dated liquidation were entitled to release of their plots, because the transactions were verified as genuine, there was no material showing dominant intention to prefer creditors, and the RBI prohibition order did not invalidate completed third-party conveyances. The Court treated them as similarly placed with purchasers who had already obtained final relief, rejected objections based on alleged lack of authorisation, demarcation, bank records and later layout cancellation, and directed handover of the plots. The review petition by the ex-management side was dismissed, as the applicant had no independent locus standi and the attempt was a proxy effort to reopen final winding-up orders concerning verified investor claims.
Bona fide plot purchasers whose bookings and registered sale deeds pre-dated liquidation were entitled to release of their plots, because the transactions were verified as genuine, there was no material showing dominant intention to prefer creditors, and the RBI prohibition order did not invalidate completed third-party conveyances. The Court treated them as similarly placed with purchasers who had already obtained final relief, rejected objections based on alleged lack of authorisation, demarcation, bank records and later layout cancellation, and directed handover of the plots. The review petition by the ex-management side was dismissed, as the applicant had no independent locus standi and the attempt was a proxy effort to reopen final winding-up orders concerning verified investor claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.