Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Bona fide plot purchasers whose bookings and registered sale deeds pre-dated liquidation were entitled to release of their plots, because the transactions were verified as genuine, there was no material showing dominant intention to prefer creditors, and the RBI prohibition order did not invalidate completed third-party conveyances. The Court treated them as similarly placed with purchasers who had already obtained final relief, rejected objections based on alleged lack of authorisation, demarcation, bank records and later layout cancellation, and directed handover of the plots. The review petition by the ex-management side was dismissed, as the applicant had no independent locus standi and the attempt was a proxy effort to reopen final winding-up orders concerning verified investor claims.
Bona fide plot purchasers whose bookings and registered sale deeds pre-dated liquidation were entitled to release of their plots, because the transactions were verified as genuine, there was no material showing dominant intention to prefer creditors, and the RBI prohibition order did not invalidate completed third-party conveyances. The Court treated them as similarly placed with purchasers who had already obtained final relief, rejected objections based on alleged lack of authorisation, demarcation, bank records and later layout cancellation, and directed handover of the plots. The review petition by the ex-management side was dismissed, as the applicant had no independent locus standi and the attempt was a proxy effort to reopen final winding-up orders concerning verified investor claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.