Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Vicarious liability for non-realisation of export proceeds requires proof that the director was in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the time of the contravention. The Tribunal held that most exports occurred after the director's resignation, one claim had not yet matured for realisation, and the complaint did not identify his specific role or any material showing personal responsibility for the unrealised proceeds. In the absence of a factual foundation establishing day-to-day control or responsibility, the department failed to discharge the burden for fastening penalty, and the penalty was cancelled.
Vicarious liability for non-realisation of export proceeds requires proof that the director was in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the time of the contravention. The Tribunal held that most exports occurred after the director's resignation, one claim had not yet matured for realisation, and the complaint did not identify his specific role or any material showing personal responsibility for the unrealised proceeds. In the absence of a factual foundation establishing day-to-day control or responsibility, the department failed to discharge the burden for fastening penalty, and the penalty was cancelled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.