Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC declined to quash a cheque dishonour complaint under the inherent jurisdiction because the consent terms prima facie suspended remedies without extinguishing the pending prosecution, and the dispute over transfer of liability and the effect of settlement raised factual and interpretive issues unsuitable for pre-trial interference. The Court distinguished settlements that subsume the original complaint and held that quashing is confined to cases where unimpeachable material completely displaces the allegations. It also upheld closure of cross-examination after repeated adjournments, rejected the challenge to framing of notice in light of counsel's submission that payment could not be made and the matter should proceed, and found no prejudice was shown in the recording of the accused's statement.
HC declined to quash a cheque dishonour complaint under the inherent jurisdiction because the consent terms prima facie suspended remedies without extinguishing the pending prosecution, and the dispute over transfer of liability and the effect of settlement raised factual and interpretive issues unsuitable for pre-trial interference. The Court distinguished settlements that subsume the original complaint and held that quashing is confined to cases where unimpeachable material completely displaces the allegations. It also upheld closure of cross-examination after repeated adjournments, rejected the challenge to framing of notice in light of counsel's submission that payment could not be made and the matter should proceed, and found no prejudice was shown in the recording of the accused's statement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
