Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Allegations of coercive GST recovery during search failed where panchnamas, the written undertaking and recorded answers showed the taxpayer admitted the liability, agreed to pay after temporary registration, and stated the statement was made without pressure or threat; prolonged silence without complaint also undermined the coercion plea. FORM GST DRC-04 issued later was treated as mere acknowledgment of voluntary payment, with no prescribed time limit and no prejudice shown. Refund was unavailable because the tax, interest and penalty had been voluntarily discharged on the basis of search material, and refund lies only where tax was not payable or was paid in excess.
Allegations of coercive GST recovery during search failed where panchnamas, the written undertaking and recorded answers showed the taxpayer admitted the liability, agreed to pay after temporary registration, and stated the statement was made without pressure or threat; prolonged silence without complaint also undermined the coercion plea. FORM GST DRC-04 issued later was treated as mere acknowledgment of voluntary payment, with no prescribed time limit and no prejudice shown. Refund was unavailable because the tax, interest and penalty had been voluntarily discharged on the basis of search material, and refund lies only where tax was not payable or was paid in excess.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
