Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reasonable opportunity must be given before a fraud-based GST demand is confirmed where input tax credit has already been reversed and revenue interest is otherwise protected. The HC held that the petitioner could not be denied the chance to produce material documents to show genuine supply of goods and to challenge the invocation of Section 74. The impugned order was interfered with only to that limited extent, and the matter was remitted for fresh reconsideration after giving the petitioner a fair opportunity. No finding was returned on the merits of the underlying tax dispute.
Reasonable opportunity must be given before a fraud-based GST demand is confirmed where input tax credit has already been reversed and revenue interest is otherwise protected. The HC held that the petitioner could not be denied the chance to produce material documents to show genuine supply of goods and to challenge the invocation of Section 74. The impugned order was interfered with only to that limited extent, and the matter was remitted for fresh reconsideration after giving the petitioner a fair opportunity. No finding was returned on the merits of the underlying tax dispute.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
