Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A one-time fund-raising programme through coupon sales and a lucky draw was not treated as business activity where the surplus was applied to the trust's charitable objects; applying the dominant object test, the HC held that no specified violation under section 12AB(4) arose and registration could not be refused on that basis. The Court also accepted that disqualifications under section 13 are to be examined in assessment proceedings, not at the registration stage, so section 13 could not be invoked to deny registration under section 12AB. Finding no substantial question of law, the appeal was dismissed.
A one-time fund-raising programme through coupon sales and a lucky draw was not treated as business activity where the surplus was applied to the trust's charitable objects; applying the dominant object test, the HC held that no specified violation under section 12AB(4) arose and registration could not be refused on that basis. The Court also accepted that disqualifications under section 13 are to be examined in assessment proceedings, not at the registration stage, so section 13 could not be invoked to deny registration under section 12AB. Finding no substantial question of law, the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
