Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A one-time fund-raising programme through coupon sales and a lucky draw was not treated as business activity where the surplus was applied to the trust's charitable objects; applying the dominant object test, the HC held that no specified violation under section 12AB(4) arose and registration could not be refused on that basis. The Court also accepted that disqualifications under section 13 are to be examined in assessment proceedings, not at the registration stage, so section 13 could not be invoked to deny registration under section 12AB. Finding no substantial question of law, the appeal was dismissed.
A one-time fund-raising programme through coupon sales and a lucky draw was not treated as business activity where the surplus was applied to the trust's charitable objects; applying the dominant object test, the HC held that no specified violation under section 12AB(4) arose and registration could not be refused on that basis. The Court also accepted that disqualifications under section 13 are to be examined in assessment proceedings, not at the registration stage, so section 13 could not be invoked to deny registration under section 12AB. Finding no substantial question of law, the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
