Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The article notes that the ITAT treated a bank as not being an assessee in default for failure to deduct tax at source on Leave Travel Concession reimbursement during the period covered by subsisting Madras High Court interim directions. It records that compliance with that operative judicial direction meant the bank's non-deduction could not attract liability under section 201/201(1A), and the resulting demand was unsustainable. The same approach was applied to the connected appeals on the same controversy.
The article notes that the ITAT treated a bank as not being an assessee in default for failure to deduct tax at source on Leave Travel Concession reimbursement during the period covered by subsisting Madras High Court interim directions. It records that compliance with that operative judicial direction meant the bank's non-deduction could not attract liability under section 201/201(1A), and the resulting demand was unsustainable. The same approach was applied to the connected appeals on the same controversy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
