Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The article notes that the ITAT treated a bank as not being an assessee in default for failure to deduct tax at source on Leave Travel Concession reimbursement during the period covered by subsisting Madras High Court interim directions. It records that compliance with that operative judicial direction meant the bank's non-deduction could not attract liability under section 201/201(1A), and the resulting demand was unsustainable. The same approach was applied to the connected appeals on the same controversy.
The article notes that the ITAT treated a bank as not being an assessee in default for failure to deduct tax at source on Leave Travel Concession reimbursement during the period covered by subsisting Madras High Court interim directions. It records that compliance with that operative judicial direction meant the bank's non-deduction could not attract liability under section 201/201(1A), and the resulting demand was unsustainable. The same approach was applied to the connected appeals on the same controversy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.