Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The article notes that the ITAT treated a bank as not being an assessee in default for failure to deduct tax at source on Leave Travel Concession reimbursement during the period covered by subsisting Madras High Court interim directions. It records that compliance with that operative judicial direction meant the bank's non-deduction could not attract liability under section 201/201(1A), and the resulting demand was unsustainable. The same approach was applied to the connected appeals on the same controversy.
The article notes that the ITAT treated a bank as not being an assessee in default for failure to deduct tax at source on Leave Travel Concession reimbursement during the period covered by subsisting Madras High Court interim directions. It records that compliance with that operative judicial direction meant the bank's non-deduction could not attract liability under section 201/201(1A), and the resulting demand was unsustainable. The same approach was applied to the connected appeals on the same controversy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.