Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For unquoted equity shares, Rule 11UA(2) gives the assessee the choice of either the NAV method or the DCF method for fair market value, and the Assessing Officer cannot substitute NAV for the method chosen by the assessee. The AO may, however, scrutinise whether the DCF valuation is supported by reliable projections and material; where serious defects remain unexplained, the valuation as filed cannot be accepted. In that situation, the proper course is a fresh valuation by an approved valuer on the DCF basis, with the matter decided afresh in accordance with law. The same approach applies where later-year facts are identical.
For unquoted equity shares, Rule 11UA(2) gives the assessee the choice of either the NAV method or the DCF method for fair market value, and the Assessing Officer cannot substitute NAV for the method chosen by the assessee. The AO may, however, scrutinise whether the DCF valuation is supported by reliable projections and material; where serious defects remain unexplained, the valuation as filed cannot be accepted. In that situation, the proper course is a fresh valuation by an approved valuer on the DCF basis, with the matter decided afresh in accordance with law. The same approach applies where later-year facts are identical.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
