Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For unquoted equity shares, Rule 11UA(2) gives the assessee the choice of either the NAV method or the DCF method for fair market value, and the Assessing Officer cannot substitute NAV for the method chosen by the assessee. The AO may, however, scrutinise whether the DCF valuation is supported by reliable projections and material; where serious defects remain unexplained, the valuation as filed cannot be accepted. In that situation, the proper course is a fresh valuation by an approved valuer on the DCF basis, with the matter decided afresh in accordance with law. The same approach applies where later-year facts are identical.
For unquoted equity shares, Rule 11UA(2) gives the assessee the choice of either the NAV method or the DCF method for fair market value, and the Assessing Officer cannot substitute NAV for the method chosen by the assessee. The AO may, however, scrutinise whether the DCF valuation is supported by reliable projections and material; where serious defects remain unexplained, the valuation as filed cannot be accepted. In that situation, the proper course is a fresh valuation by an approved valuer on the DCF basis, with the matter decided afresh in accordance with law. The same approach applies where later-year facts are identical.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.