Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
For unquoted equity shares, Rule 11UA(2) gives the assessee the choice of either the NAV method or the DCF method for fair market value, and the Assessing Officer cannot substitute NAV for the method chosen by the assessee. The AO may, however, scrutinise whether the DCF valuation is supported by reliable projections and material; where serious defects remain unexplained, the valuation as filed cannot be accepted. In that situation, the proper course is a fresh valuation by an approved valuer on the DCF basis, with the matter decided afresh in accordance with law. The same approach applies where later-year facts are identical.
For unquoted equity shares, Rule 11UA(2) gives the assessee the choice of either the NAV method or the DCF method for fair market value, and the Assessing Officer cannot substitute NAV for the method chosen by the assessee. The AO may, however, scrutinise whether the DCF valuation is supported by reliable projections and material; where serious defects remain unexplained, the valuation as filed cannot be accepted. In that situation, the proper course is a fresh valuation by an approved valuer on the DCF basis, with the matter decided afresh in accordance with law. The same approach applies where later-year facts are identical.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
