Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Contemporaneous protest must be explicit to support a later challenge to imported marble slab measurements; an unqualified acceptance of the measurement report and agreement to pay differential duty barred a belated request for re-measurement, so the rejection of re-measurement was upheld. For confiscation and penalty, the Tribunal treated the marginal excess over the tolerance limit as attributable to the measurement method used for irregular slabs and noted that trade practice allowed such variation. It held that customs penal consequences require deliberate misdeclaration, wilful misstatement, suppression, or other dishonest conduct, and a bona fide measurement dispute is insufficient. Redemption fine and penalty were set aside, while the differential duty liability remained.
Contemporaneous protest must be explicit to support a later challenge to imported marble slab measurements; an unqualified acceptance of the measurement report and agreement to pay differential duty barred a belated request for re-measurement, so the rejection of re-measurement was upheld. For confiscation and penalty, the Tribunal treated the marginal excess over the tolerance limit as attributable to the measurement method used for irregular slabs and noted that trade practice allowed such variation. It held that customs penal consequences require deliberate misdeclaration, wilful misstatement, suppression, or other dishonest conduct, and a bona fide measurement dispute is insufficient. Redemption fine and penalty were set aside, while the differential duty liability remained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.