Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
EPS-ECU and its parts were treated as parts of the automobile power steering system under CTH 8708 94 00. The reasoning accepted that EPS-ECU has no independent function as an electrical machine or regulating instrument and operates only with torque and speed sensors as an integral component of the steering system. Because the goods were designed solely for automobiles with power steering and were not more specifically covered elsewhere, the specific steering-parts heading prevailed over the alternative and residual headings.
EPS-ECU and its parts were treated as parts of the automobile power steering system under CTH 8708 94 00. The reasoning accepted that EPS-ECU has no independent function as an electrical machine or regulating instrument and operates only with torque and speed sensors as an integral component of the steering system. Because the goods were designed solely for automobiles with power steering and were not more specifically covered elsewhere, the specific steering-parts heading prevailed over the alternative and residual headings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.