Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Related-party customs valuation was re-opened because later investigation disclosed fresh agreements, merger-related changes and different valuation methodologies, so earlier SVB and Tribunal orders did not bar reconsideration. The declared transaction value was rejected as not reflecting an uninfluenced price; valuation was directed on the deductive method where list price existed and on the computed method where it did not, with a 38% trade discount, admissible general expenses, and no separate addition for freight or insurance. Exemption under Notification No. 89/1982-Cus. was denied for SAD under strict construction, the extended limitation period was upheld for suppression, confiscation on an unnotified ground was set aside, and interest and penalty survived only for the BCD component.
Related-party customs valuation was re-opened because later investigation disclosed fresh agreements, merger-related changes and different valuation methodologies, so earlier SVB and Tribunal orders did not bar reconsideration. The declared transaction value was rejected as not reflecting an uninfluenced price; valuation was directed on the deductive method where list price existed and on the computed method where it did not, with a 38% trade discount, admissible general expenses, and no separate addition for freight or insurance. Exemption under Notification No. 89/1982-Cus. was denied for SAD under strict construction, the extended limitation period was upheld for suppression, confiscation on an unnotified ground was set aside, and interest and penalty survived only for the BCD component.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
