Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Related-party customs valuation was re-opened because later investigation disclosed fresh agreements, merger-related changes and different valuation methodologies, so earlier SVB and Tribunal orders did not bar reconsideration. The declared transaction value was rejected as not reflecting an uninfluenced price; valuation was directed on the deductive method where list price existed and on the computed method where it did not, with a 38% trade discount, admissible general expenses, and no separate addition for freight or insurance. Exemption under Notification No. 89/1982-Cus. was denied for SAD under strict construction, the extended limitation period was upheld for suppression, confiscation on an unnotified ground was set aside, and interest and penalty survived only for the BCD component.
Related-party customs valuation was re-opened because later investigation disclosed fresh agreements, merger-related changes and different valuation methodologies, so earlier SVB and Tribunal orders did not bar reconsideration. The declared transaction value was rejected as not reflecting an uninfluenced price; valuation was directed on the deductive method where list price existed and on the computed method where it did not, with a 38% trade discount, admissible general expenses, and no separate addition for freight or insurance. Exemption under Notification No. 89/1982-Cus. was denied for SAD under strict construction, the extended limitation period was upheld for suppression, confiscation on an unnotified ground was set aside, and interest and penalty survived only for the BCD component.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
