Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5041 to 5060 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The text states that the three-month period for filing a bankruptcy application against a personal guarantor is directory, not mandatory, because Section 121(2) uses mandatory language without prescribing any consequence for delay. It further states that delay may be condoned on sufficient cause under the Limitation Act read with Section 238A of the Code, and that a dismissal solely on limitation without reasons is unsustainable. The application was therefore restored for consideration on merits.
The text states that the three-month period for filing a bankruptcy application against a personal guarantor is directory, not mandatory, because Section 121(2) uses mandatory language without prescribing any consequence for delay. It further states that delay may be condoned on sufficient cause under the Limitation Act read with Section 238A of the Code, and that a dismissal solely on limitation without reasons is unsustainable. The application was therefore restored for consideration on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.