Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The text states that the three-month period for filing a bankruptcy application against a personal guarantor is directory, not mandatory, because Section 121(2) uses mandatory language without prescribing any consequence for delay. It further states that delay may be condoned on sufficient cause under the Limitation Act read with Section 238A of the Code, and that a dismissal solely on limitation without reasons is unsustainable. The application was therefore restored for consideration on merits.
The text states that the three-month period for filing a bankruptcy application against a personal guarantor is directory, not mandatory, because Section 121(2) uses mandatory language without prescribing any consequence for delay. It further states that delay may be condoned on sufficient cause under the Limitation Act read with Section 238A of the Code, and that a dismissal solely on limitation without reasons is unsustainable. The application was therefore restored for consideration on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.